Report for rule docu_framenames_annotated doc -> ALL OF {dId = trfn3.tex, dState = (1,1), } OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text ( The FrameNet manual describes the application of frame semantics within the project.), position = [RefEnv (document), RefEnv (abstract)], } word -> project OR1 , 2 , {dId = Chap-FNIntro3.tex, dState = (1,1), } OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (Active research projects are seeking to produce comparable frame-semantic lexicons for other languages and to devise means of automatically labeling running text with semantic frame information.), position = [RefChapter (Introduction to the Project)], } word -> information labeling research seeking text OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text ( However, event nouns such as reduction in the Cause_change_of_scalar_position frame also evoke frames: ), position = [RefChapter (Introduction to the Project)], } word -> event OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (The main purpose of annotating such items is to identify the most common predicates that ), position = [RefChapter (Introduction to the Project)], } word -> purpose OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (We do recognize that artifact and natural kind nouns also have a minimal frame structure of their own.), position = [RefChapter (Introduction to the Project)], } word -> artifact OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text ( However, the frames evoked by artifact and natural kind nouns rarely dominate the clauses in which they occur, and so are seldom selected as targets of annotation.), position = [RefChapter (Introduction to the Project)], } word -> artifact OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (The full data, available as part of the data download see the FNdata link on the FrameNet homepage , include these three layers and several more not discussed here for all of the annotated sentences, along with complete frame and FE descriptions, frame-to-frame relations, and lexical entries summarizing the valence patterns for each annotated LU.), position = [RefChapter (Introduction to the Project)], } word -> summarizing OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (The annotation of running text is technically possible thanks to the annotation layering technique: FN lexicographers can one by one declare each word in a sentence a target, select a frame relative to which the new target is to be annotated, get a new set of annotation layers frame element, grammatical function, phrase type and appropriate frame element tags, and then annotate the relevant constituents.), position = [RefChapter (Introduction to the Project)], } word -> text type OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (Thus, while a traditional lexicographer measures progress in words completed, FrameNet measures progress in frames completed.), position = [RefChapter (Introduction to the Project), RefSection (Comparison with WordNet and ontologies), RefEnv (itemize), RefItem ()], } word -> measures progress OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (Using: The child frame presupposes the parent frame as background, e.g the ), position = [RefChapter (Introduction to the Project), RefSection (Comparison with WordNet and ontologies), RefEnv (itemize), RefItem (), RefEnv (itemize), RefItem ()], } word -> Using OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (Subframe: The child frame is a subevent of a complex event represented by the parent, e.g.), position = [RefChapter (Introduction to the Project), RefSection (Comparison with WordNet and ontologies), RefEnv (itemize), RefItem (), RefEnv (itemize), RefItem ()], } word -> event OR1 , 2 , {dId = Chap-FrameDevel.tex, dState = (1,1), } OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (Note that when multiple perspectives on a type of scenario are possible, typically we relate the frames that carry particular perspectives to a non-perspectivized background/scenario frame.), position = [RefChapter (Frame Development), RefEnv (itemize), RefItem ()], } word -> type OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> ALL OF {content = Text (One may, for instance, conclude that two different frames are involved with ), position = [RefChapter (Frame Development), RefEnv (itemize), RefItem ()], } word -> instance OR1 , 2 , {content = Text (given that, in the naive physics sense, the kinds of entities that have color are much more numerous and spread out over a greater part of an ontology than the entities that can be broken in the concrete physical sense .), position = [RefChapter (Frame Development), RefEnv (itemize), RefItem ()], } word -> color OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (frame containing lexical units such as ), position = [RefChapter (Frame Development), RefEnv (itemize), RefItem ()], } word -> containing OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (However, the desideratum that all the LUs in a frame share pre-specifications on a frame element is often relaxed in practice, as it would result in very fine-grained frames that are impractical to manage.), position = [RefChapter (Frame Development), RefEnv (itemize), RefItem ()], } word -> practice OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (which take opposite points of view on a single event, are placed into separate frames because they profile different sets of participants.), position = [RefChapter (Frame Development), RefEnv (itemize), RefItem ()], } word -> event OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (frame would be marked with the semantic type Positive_judgment, while the adjective ), position = [RefChapter (Frame Development), RefEnv (itemize), RefItem ()], } {content = Text (would be assigned the semantic type Negative_judgment.), position = [RefChapter (Frame Development), RefEnv (itemize), RefItem ()], } word -> type OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (There are, for instance, many pairs of utterances where the total meaning of one member is built up compositionally from several frame evoking elements while the total meaning of the other derives just from a single lexical unit that combines within it the complex semantic structure that can be expressed with multiple frame evoking elements.), position = [RefChapter (Frame Development)], } word -> evoking instance OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (Similarly, sometimes the frame relation Using also connects frames whose targets can figure in utterances that are paraphrases of each other.), position = [RefChapter (Frame Development)], } word -> Using OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (For a more detailed discussion of the various frame relations, see section ), position = [RefChapter (Frame Development)], } word -> discussion OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (There is, however, one kind of hybrid case where FrameNet groups lexical units in the same frame, even though the alternating lexical units do not participate in the same syntactic constructions and despite the difference in the relative prominence that the evoked frames have in the sentence.), position = [RefChapter (Frame Development)], } word -> prominence OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (While FrameNet's practice of grouping the adjective and adverb in the same frame is in line with the logical-semantic similarity, it does not match the pragmatic-syntactic fact that the frame evoked by the syntactic head of the clause is more prominent.), position = [RefChapter (Frame Development)], } word -> practice similarity OR1 , 2 , {dId = Chap-WhatGetsAnnotated.tex, dState = (1,1), } OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (Annotation of running text is technically possible thanks to the annotation layering technique: FN lexicographers can one by one declare each word in a sentence a target, select a frame relative to which the new target is to be annotated, get a new set of annotation layers frame element, grammatical function, phrase type and appropriate frame element tags, and then annotate the relevant constituents.), position = [RefChapter (FrameNet Annotation), RefSection (Introduction)], } word -> text type OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (Although many sentences contain multiple frame evoking lexical units, in normal annotation we annotate only with respect to one of them.), position = [RefChapter (FrameNet Annotation), RefSection (Lexicographically motivated annotation and representation practices), RefEnv (itemize), RefItem ()], } word -> evoking OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (Also, there are some classes of frame evoking elements that we have not yet tackled, an important one being sentence connectives such as although, while, but, etc.), position = [RefChapter (FrameNet Annotation), RefSection (Lexicographically motivated annotation and representation practices), RefEnv (itemize), RefItem ()], } word -> evoking OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> ALL OF {content = Text (For instance, the verb ), position = [RefChapter (FrameNet Annotation), RefSection (Lexicographically motivated annotation and representation practices), RefSection (Coreness), RefEnv (itemize), RefItem ()], } word -> instance OR1 , 2 , {content = Text (frame always requires a postverbal complement NP denoting an entity that is similar to the entity denoted by the subject.), position = [RefChapter (FrameNet Annotation), RefSection (Lexicographically motivated annotation and representation practices), RefSection (Coreness), RefEnv (itemize), RefItem ()], } word -> entity OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> ALL OF {content = Text ( Extra-thematic frame elements situate an event against a backdrop of another state of affairs, either of an actual event or state of the same type, as illustrated with ), position = [RefChapter (FrameNet Annotation), RefSection (Lexicographically motivated annotation and representation practices), RefSection (Coreness)], } word -> event state type OR1 , 2 , {content = Text (, or by evoking a larger frame within which the reported state of affairs is embedded, as shown for ), position = [RefChapter (FrameNet Annotation), RefSection (Lexicographically motivated annotation and representation practices), RefSection (Coreness)], } word -> evoking state OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (It is assigned to FEs that behave like core frame elements in the frame where they are marked as Core-unexpressed but which, counter to expectation, may not be used for annotation in descendants of that frame.), position = [RefChapter (FrameNet Annotation), RefSection (Lexicographically motivated annotation and representation practices), RefSection (Coreness)], } word -> expectation OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (Coreness marking makes the most sense for event and state frames, and in these frames we use all three statuses.), position = [RefChapter (FrameNet Annotation), RefSection (Lexicographically motivated annotation and representation practices), RefSection (Coreness)], } word -> event state OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (For instance, in the ), position = [RefChapter (FrameNet Annotation), RefSection (Lexicographically motivated annotation and representation practices), RefSection (Coreness)], } word -> instance OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> ALL OF {content = Text (For instance, ), position = [RefChapter (FrameNet Annotation), RefSection (Lexicographically motivated annotation and representation practices), RefSection (Frame element relations), RefSection (Coreness Sets)], } word -> instance OR1 , 2 , {content = Text (are core FEs in the various motion frames in the database.), position = [RefChapter (FrameNet Annotation), RefSection (Lexicographically motivated annotation and representation practices), RefSection (Frame element relations), RefSection (Coreness Sets)], } word -> motion OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (Sentences in many motion frames can be informationally complete and pragmatically felicitous with just one or two of the FEs expressed, as shown in 15 - 18 .), position = [RefChapter (FrameNet Annotation), RefSection (Lexicographically motivated annotation and representation practices), RefSection (Frame element relations), RefSection (Coreness Sets)], } word -> motion OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (frame is an instance of a much more common pattern of alternation between a symmetric/reciprocal and an asymmetric construal of events or states involving two parties.), position = [RefChapter (FrameNet Annotation), RefSection (Lexicographically motivated annotation and representation practices), RefSection (Frame element relations), RefSection (Excludes)], } word -> instance OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (For instance, in the ), position = [RefChapter (FrameNet Annotation), RefSection (Lexicographically motivated annotation and representation practices), RefSection (Frame element relations), RefSection (Excludes)], } word -> instance OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (event.), position = [RefChapter (FrameNet Annotation), RefSection (Lexicographically motivated annotation and representation practices), RefSection (Frame element relations), RefSection (Excludes)], } {content = Text (relation also manifests in frames where an event can be brought about either by an intentional ), position = [RefChapter (FrameNet Annotation), RefSection (Lexicographically motivated annotation and representation practices), RefSection (Frame element relations), RefSection (Excludes)], } word -> event OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (This would make it possible, for instance, to have a ), position = [RefChapter (FrameNet Annotation), RefSection (Lexicographically motivated annotation and representation practices), RefSection (Frame element relations), RefSection (Future refinements)], } word -> instance OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> ALL OF {content = Text (Currently, predicates denoting intentional killing are in the ), position = [RefChapter (FrameNet Annotation), RefSection (Lexicographically motivated annotation and representation practices), RefSection (Frame element relations), RefSection (Future refinements), RefFootnote], } word -> killing OR1 , 2 , {content = Text (frame together with predicates that allow either intentional or non-intentional causation.), position = [RefChapter (FrameNet Annotation), RefSection (Lexicographically motivated annotation and representation practices), RefSection (Frame element relations), RefSection (Future refinements), RefFootnote], } word -> causation OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text ( Given the earlier discussion of Frame Development in section ), position = [RefChapter (FrameNet Annotation), RefSection (Lexicographically motivated annotation and representation practices), RefSection (Frame element relations), RefSection (Future refinements)], } word -> discussion OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (A separate treatment of these subject selection facts would be parsimonious and would also expose the essential lexical similarity between the English frames and the frames of languages such as Japanese, where subject selection is much more restricted and ), position = [RefChapter (FrameNet Annotation), RefSection (Lexicographically motivated annotation and representation practices), RefSection (Frame element relations), RefSection (Future refinements)], } word -> similarity OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (, it would have been theoretically justifiable to omit selecting phrases outside of the standard subcategorization frame of the target noun and to instead rely on automatic tools for syntactic analysis to identify phrases outside the target's maximal projection that give information about the filler of a frame element role.), position = [RefChapter (FrameNet Annotation), RefSection (Lexicographically motivated annotation and representation practices), RefSection (Governing verbs of target nouns, adjectives, and prepositions)], } word -> information OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (the verb not to have the same meaning independently of the frame evoking element more or less equivalently, this can be thought of as the frame evoking noun selecting the support , ), position = [RefChapter (FrameNet Annotation), RefSection (Lexicographically motivated annotation and representation practices), RefSection (Governing verbs of target nouns, adjectives, and prepositions), RefSection (Support predicates), RefEnv (itemize), RefItem ()], } word -> evoking OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (Thus, any differences that exist between support predicates including most saliently the introduction of causation will be captured by describing these predicates as frame evoking elements in very generic frames.), position = [RefChapter (FrameNet Annotation), RefSection (Lexicographically motivated annotation and representation practices), RefSection (Governing verbs of target nouns, adjectives, and prepositions), RefSection (Support predicates)], } word -> causation evoking OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (occurs in many other sentence frames too and there are some cases of structural ambiguity where it is a copular verb under one reading, and an auxiliary under the other.), position = [RefChapter (FrameNet Annotation), RefSection (Lexicographically motivated annotation and representation practices), RefSection (Governing verbs of target nouns, adjectives, and prepositions), RefSection (Copular verbs)], } word -> reading OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (Any frame elements of the frame evoked by the artifact noun that are realized within the X-phrase are annotated with frame elements as usual.), position = [RefChapter (FrameNet Annotation), RefSection (Lexicographically motivated annotation and representation practices), RefSection (Governing verbs of target nouns, adjectives, and prepositions), RefSection (X-Governors)], } word -> artifact OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (Support predicates are governors of event-denoting nouns that serve mainly to project a clause centered on the frame of the noun.), position = [RefChapter (FrameNet Annotation), RefSection (Annotation with nouns as targets), RefSection (Special governors)], } word -> project OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (Copular verbs are a semantically very bleached type of support expression used to project clauses centered on the frames of event or relation-denoting nouns.), position = [RefChapter (FrameNet Annotation), RefSection (Annotation with nouns as targets), RefSection (Special governors)], } word -> event project type OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (of artifact nouns are verbs that evoke frames that involve the qualia structure of the artifact nouns.), position = [RefChapter (FrameNet Annotation), RefSection (Annotation with nouns as targets), RefSection (Special governors)], } word -> artifact OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (We define support verbs as those verbs that combine with a state noun or an event noun to create a verbal predicate, allowing arguments of the verb to fill the slots of the frame elements of the frame evoked by the noun.), position = [RefChapter (FrameNet Annotation), RefSection (Annotation with nouns as targets), RefSection (Special governors), RefSection (Support expressions)], } word -> event state OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text ( Both of these examples report an act of revenge rather than an act of taking, the frame evoked by the noun ), position = [RefChapter (FrameNet Annotation), RefSection (Annotation with nouns as targets), RefSection (Special governors), RefSection (Support expressions)], } word -> revenge taking OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (Plain Vanilla: the support adds virtually nothing to the frame evoking element e.g.), position = [RefChapter (FrameNet Annotation), RefSection (Annotation with nouns as targets), RefSection (Special governors), RefSection (Support expressions), RefEnv (itemize), RefItem ()], } word -> evoking OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (Aspectual: the support changes the temporal focus of the event portrayed by the frame evoking noun, e.g.), position = [RefChapter (FrameNet Annotation), RefSection (Annotation with nouns as targets), RefSection (Special governors), RefSection (Support expressions), RefEnv (itemize), RefItem ()], } word -> event evoking OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (Point-of-view: the support changes the profiled point-of-view of the frame evoking noun, e.g.), position = [RefChapter (FrameNet Annotation), RefSection (Annotation with nouns as targets), RefSection (Special governors), RefSection (Support expressions), RefEnv (itemize), RefItem ()], } word -> evoking OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (This is the case, for instance, for the ), position = [RefChapter (FrameNet Annotation), RefSection (Annotation with nouns as targets), RefSection (Special governors), RefSection (Support expressions), RefEnv (itemize), RefItem ()], } word -> instance OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (For instance, while the noun ), position = [RefChapter (FrameNet Annotation), RefSection (Annotation with nouns as targets), RefSection (Special governors), RefSection (Support expressions)], } word -> instance OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (-construction that serves to introduce an instance of the frame evoked by the noun target into the discourse.), position = [RefChapter (FrameNet Annotation), RefSection (Annotation with nouns as targets), RefSection (Special governors), RefSection (#Existential sentences)], } word -> instance OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (for verbs that evoke a frame that is related via a background scenario to the frame evoked by the event noun.), position = [RefChapter (FrameNet Annotation), RefSection (Annotation with nouns as targets), RefSection (Special governors), RefSection (Controllers)], } word -> event OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (Thus, for a compound like weapons treaty we annotate weapons as a frame element relative to the noun treaty which belongs to a Documents frame , but we do not annotate treaty as a frame element relative to weapons.), position = [RefChapter (FrameNet Annotation), RefSection (Annotation with nouns as targets), RefSection (Noun Compounds)], } word -> Documents OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (While the non-head must figure in some frame evoked by the head, the reverse is not true in the same way; there is no sense that weapons saliently and consistently causes speakers to think about how their manufacture and possession is regulated.), position = [RefChapter (FrameNet Annotation), RefSection (Annotation with nouns as targets), RefSection (Noun Compounds)], } word -> possession OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text ( processing facilities, where food is tagged as ), position = [RefChapter (FrameNet Annotation), RefSection (Annotation with nouns as targets), RefSection (Noun Compounds)], } word -> food OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (, for instance, lives in the ), position = [RefChapter (FrameNet Annotation), RefSection (Annotation with adjectives as targets), RefSection (Relational modification)], } word -> instance OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (However, prepositions are appropriate targets of annotation in frames that cover the vocabulary of space, time, and motion, as shown in the following examples.), position = [RefChapter (FrameNet Annotation), RefSection (Annotation with prepositions as targets)], } word -> motion OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (Some nouns--for example, natural kind and artifact nouns like ), position = [RefChapter (FrameNet Annotation), RefSection (Annotation relative to slot fillers)], } word -> artifact OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text ( In several frames containing artifact nouns, we also have defined some frame elements reflecting a kind of), position = [RefChapter (FrameNet Annotation), RefSection (Annotation relative to slot fillers)], } word -> artifact containing OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (frame a semantic type `Material'.), position = [RefChapter (FrameNet Annotation), RefSection (Annotation relative to slot fillers)], } word -> type OR1 , 2 , {dId = Chap-PTs.tex, dState = (1,1), } OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (for small clauses modifying either a participant of the main clause as in 108 - 109 or the frame instance evoked by the main clause predicate 110 .), position = [RefChapter (Identifying Phrase Types), RefSection (Phrase Type Labels for Clauses), RefSection (Absolutive non-finite clauses)], } word -> instance OR1 , 2 , {dId = Chap-GFs.tex, dState = (1,1), } OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (However, they are targets in frames that cover the vocabulary of space, time, and motion.), position = [RefChapter (Assigning Grammatical Functions), RefSection (Assigning GFs for Prepositions)], } word -> motion OR1 , 2 , {dId = Chap-FrameRelations2.tex, dState = (1,1), } OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (and other frame-to-frame relations allow us to represent the information present in the FN1 concept of Domains.), position = [RefChapter (Semantic Relations), RefSection (Frame-to-frame Relations)], } word -> information OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (Domains also had a degree of theoretical significance: they were broad-level generalizations over the frame network that is under construction.), position = [RefChapter (Semantic Relations), RefSection (Frame-to-frame Relations)], } word -> network OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (Information on frame-to-frame relations is included in the relevant frame reports.), position = [RefChapter (Semantic Relations), RefSection (Frame-to-frame Relations)], } word -> Information OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (Also, the ordering and other temporal relationships of the subframes can be specified using binary precedence relations.), position = [RefChapter (Semantic Relations), RefSection (Frame-to-frame Relations), RefSection (SubFrames)], } word -> using OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text ( For each step in the process, there is a separate frame in the database, including ), position = [RefChapter (Semantic Relations), RefSection (Frame-to-frame Relations), RefSection (SubFrames)], } word -> process OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (The system of subframe links is also quite complex.), position = [RefChapter (Semantic Relations), RefSection (Frame-to-frame Relations), RefSection (SubFrames)], } word -> system OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (frame containing verbs such as ), position = [RefChapter (Semantic Relations), RefSection (Frame-to-frame Relations), RefSection (Frame Inheritance)], } word -> containing OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> ALL OF {content = Text (commits a crime by illegally taking ), position = [RefChapter (Semantic Relations), RefSection (Frame-to-frame Relations), RefSection (Frame Inheritance)], } word -> taking OR1 , 2 , {content = Text (into their own possession.), position = [RefChapter (Semantic Relations), RefSection (Frame-to-frame Relations), RefSection (Frame Inheritance)], } word -> possession OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (, and text in the Seeking frame that explains the difference.), position = [RefChapter (Semantic Relations), RefSection (Frame-to-frame Relations), RefSection (SeeAlso)], } word -> Seeking text OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (In such cases, the specific frame has a Using relationship with the schematic frame, and bindings between the Frame Elements and subframes may be specified.), position = [RefChapter (Semantic Relations), RefSection (Frame-to-frame Relations), RefSection (Using)], } word -> Using OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (frame has a Using relationship marked by a green line with the ), position = [RefChapter (Semantic Relations), RefSection (Frame-to-frame Relations), RefSection (Using)], } word -> Using OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (because it is not a simple subtype of a purely cognitive state.), position = [RefChapter (Semantic Relations), RefSection (Frame-to-frame Relations), RefSection (Using)], } word -> state OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (For that reason, it is connected to the ), position = [RefChapter (Semantic Relations), RefSection (Frame-to-frame Relations), RefSection (Using)], } word -> reason OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (For instance, in the ), position = [RefChapter (Semantic Relations), RefSection (Semantic Type), RefEnv (itemize), RefItem ()], } word -> instance OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (Useful, functional marking on frames, such as the type "Non-lexical" on frames which are present purely to participate in Inheritance, Subframe, or Using relations with other frames ), position = [RefChapter (Semantic Relations), RefSection (Semantic Type), RefEnv (itemize), RefItem ()], } word -> Using type OR1 , 2 , {dId = Chap-RecentInnov.tex, dState = (1,1), } OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (But apart from creating new frames and annotations, we have also spent considerable effort on making our policies for frame creation and annotation more precise and consistent, and on then implementing the refined policies.), position = [RefChapter (Current status of the project)], } word -> creating OR1 , 2 , OR1 , 2 context -> {content = Text (The separation of the two frames makes explicit what before might have appeared to be merely an accident, namely that some lexical units lack either causative or inchoative uses.), position = [RefChapter (Current status of the project)], } word -> separation OR1 , 2