User Tools

Site Tools


midd:traffic_scheduling:project_log

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
midd:traffic_scheduling:project_log [2009/04/12 17:27]
perryk
midd:traffic_scheduling:project_log [2009/04/14 23:08]
perryk
Line 106: Line 106:
  
 AB - Got Mono up and running for C# development on Linux. Connected to Perry'​s databases. Traffic analysis is next. AB - Got Mono up and running for C# development on Linux. Connected to Perry'​s databases. Traffic analysis is next.
 +
 +
 +==== 04/06 ====
 +
 +AB, PK - Lunch meeting.
 +
 +AB - Filtered Perry'​s C# code to remove the "​unversionable"​ bits and committed it to our Subversion repository.
  
 ==== 04/08 ==== ==== 04/08 ====
  
 PK - researched and found a means of performing more high resolution timing in .net. PK - researched and found a means of performing more high resolution timing in .net.
 +
 +AB - Designed client analysis.
  
 ==== 04/09 ==== ==== 04/09 ====
Line 117: Line 126:
 ==== 04/10 ==== ==== 04/10 ====
  
-I was in the process of doing this (see above) when I could not reinstall the Spring ​drivers. Looking for a new set of drivers, I found a completely revamped set from Spring. Installing, and guess what - the NDIS adapter can not be directly seen by winpcap. Successfully sending and receiving via our software over the Sprint card to our server.+I was in the process of doing this (see above) when I could not reinstall the Sprint ​drivers. Looking for a new set of drivers, I found a completely revamped set from Sprint. Installing, and guess what - the NDIS adapter can not be directly seen by winpcap. Successfully sending and receiving via our software over the Sprint card to our server.
  
 ==== 04/12 ==== ==== 04/12 ====
Line 132: Line 141:
  
 At this point I think the software is done to the point where meaningful capture is all there. Crud. I still have to send capture data from the server to the client when asked. I'll do this next. At this point I think the software is done to the point where meaningful capture is all there. Crud. I still have to send capture data from the server to the client when asked. I'll do this next.
 +
 +==== 04/12 ====
 +
 +Still coding (later that day). Added "​runid"​ to the UDP and both TCP plug-ins. The TCP case involved added a preamble (first bytes sent over the socket) so that both sides can have the same runid. I've had enough for today.
 +
 +==== 04/13 ====
 +
 +AB - Continued work on basic analysis. Unfortunately not yet ready to commit. Complications,​ bleary eyes, hazy mind, the usual suspects for excuses.
 +
 +PK - Rewrite of the client UI bringing all plugins and all adapters under a single executable. Very pleased. Captured data on 3 adapters X 5 plugins simultaneously (15 data streams).
 +
 +
  
midd/traffic_scheduling/project_log.txt ยท Last modified: 2009/05/15 14:55 by afbarnard