J/ApJ/455/88 J/ApJ/455/88 CFRS IV: 0300+00 field F Hammer D Crampton O Le Fevre S J Lilly Astrophys. J. 455 88 1995 1995ApJ...455...88H J/ApJ/455/60 : CFRS II: 0000-00 and 1000+25 fields (Le Fevre+ 1995) J/ApJ/455/75 : CFRS III: 1415+52 and 2215+00 fields (Lilly+ 1995) J/ApJ/464/79 : CFRS XI: High-redshift field galaxies morphology (Schade+ 1996) Lilly S.J. et al., Paper I. =1995ApJ...455...50L Le Fevre O. et al.. Paper II. =1995ApJ...455...60L, Cat. <J/ApJ/455/60> Lilly S.J. et al., Paper III. =1995ApJ...455...75L, Cat. <J/ApJ/455/75> Crampton D. et al., Paper V. =1995ApJ...455...96C Lilly S. J. et al., Paper VI. =1995ApJ...455..108L Hammer F. et al., Paper VII. =1995MNRAS.276.1085H Le Fevre O. et al., Paper VIII. =1996ApJ...461..534L Schade D. et al., Paper IX. =1995ApJ...451L...1S Schade D. et al., Paper X. =1996MNRAS.278...95S Schade D. et al., Paper XI. =1996ApJ...464...79S, Cat. <J/ApJ/464/79> Tresse L. et al., Paper XII. =1996MNRAS.281..847T Galaxies, photometry Galaxies, spectra Redshifts catalogs galaxies: distances and redshifts methods: observational Possible surface brightness selection effects in the redshift catalogs of the Canada-France Redshift Survey are investigated through comparisons of subsamples of the data. Our analyses demonstrate that the securing of redshifts is independent of possible biases arising from surface brightness effects and/or differing galaxy morphologies and orientations. The unusual geometry of the mask designs for our spectroscopic observations also do not produce any significant bias. There is, however, a bias at the highest and lowest redshifts, especially for absorption-line galaxies at z>1 and z<0.2, due to the adopted spectral range (4250-8500A). Apart from the latter, we conclude that our sample of identified galaxies is an unbiased subsample of the original photometric catalog and is essentially limited by I-band flux density (17.5<I_AB_<22.5). Finally, spectroscopic data for the remaining CFRS field is presented. Data for 272 objects in the 0300+0000 field are given.

CFRS Canada-France Redshift Survey designation --- RAh Right ascension (J2000) h RAm Right ascension (J2000) min RAs Right ascension (J2000) s DE- Declination sign --- DEd Declination (J2000) deg DEm Declination (J2000) arcmin DEs Declination (J2000) arcsec Imag I_AB_ magnitude number=1 Measured in isophotal aperture; see CFRS I. (1995ApJ...455...50L) mag V-I (V-I)_AB_ colour index number=2 Measured in a 3" aperture; see CFRS I. (1995ApJ...455...50L) mag Q Compactness parameter; see CFRS I. (1995ApJ...455...50L) --- z Redshift --- C Confidence class of spectroscopic identification number=3 See this paper and CRFS II. (1995ApJ...455...60L) In any use of these data, attention should be paid to the confident class that has been assigned to each spectroscopic identification. Identifications with C<=1 are not used in the CFRS scientific analyses described elsewhere. See CFRS II (1995ApJ...455...60L) and CFRS III (1995ApJ...455...75L) for more information. --- Lam1 Spectroscopic feature number=4 Features noted in the spectra. These are largely self-explanatory, except that a 1 indicates that the continuum shape supported the identification in cases in which the number of distinct features was small 0.1nm Cont1 Spectroscopic feature number=4 Features noted in the spectra. These are largely self-explanatory, except that a 1 indicates that the continuum shape supported the identification in cases in which the number of distinct features was small --- Lam2 Spectroscopic feature number=4 Features noted in the spectra. These are largely self-explanatory, except that a 1 indicates that the continuum shape supported the identification in cases in which the number of distinct features was small 0.1nm Cont2 Spectroscopic feature number=4 Features noted in the spectra. These are largely self-explanatory, except that a 1 indicates that the continuum shape supported the identification in cases in which the number of distinct features was small --- Lam3 Spectroscopic feature number=4 Features noted in the spectra. These are largely self-explanatory, except that a 1 indicates that the continuum shape supported the identification in cases in which the number of distinct features was small 0.1nm Cont3 Spectroscopic feature number=4 Features noted in the spectra. These are largely self-explanatory, except that a 1 indicates that the continuum shape supported the identification in cases in which the number of distinct features was small --- Lam4 Spectroscopic feature number=4 Features noted in the spectra. These are largely self-explanatory, except that a 1 indicates that the continuum shape supported the identification in cases in which the number of distinct features was small 0.1nm Cont4 Spectroscopic feature number=4 Features noted in the spectra. These are largely self-explanatory, except that a 1 indicates that the continuum shape supported the identification in cases in which the number of distinct features was small --- Lam5 Spectroscopic feature number=4 Features noted in the spectra. These are largely self-explanatory, except that a 1 indicates that the continuum shape supported the identification in cases in which the number of distinct features was small 0.1nm Cont5 Spectroscopic feature number=4 Features noted in the spectra. These are largely self-explanatory, except that a 1 indicates that the continuum shape supported the identification in cases in which the number of distinct features was small --- Lam6 Spectroscopic feature number=4 Features noted in the spectra. These are largely self-explanatory, except that a 1 indicates that the continuum shape supported the identification in cases in which the number of distinct features was small 0.1nm Cont6 Spectroscopic feature number=4 Features noted in the spectra. These are largely self-explanatory, except that a 1 indicates that the continuum shape supported the identification in cases in which the number of distinct features was small --- Lam7 Spectroscopic feature number=4 Features noted in the spectra. These are largely self-explanatory, except that a 1 indicates that the continuum shape supported the identification in cases in which the number of distinct features was small 0.1nm James Marcout, Patricia Bauer CDS 1997Mar27 UNKNOWN UNKNOWN Prepared via OCR at CDS. J_ApJ_455_88.xml