J/A+AS/124/55 J/A+AS/124/55 Photometry of irregular variables D Cieslinski F J Jablonski J E Steiner Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 124 55 1997 1997A&AS..124...55C II/139 : General Catalog of Variable Stars, 4th Ed. (GCVS4) (Kholopov+ 1988) II/140 : New Catalogue of Suspected Variable Stars (Kukarkin+, 1982) Booth L., Charles P.A., 1982, MNRAS 201, 25p =1982MNRAS.201p..25B Downes R.A., Shara M.M., 1993, PASP 105, 127 =1993PASP..105..127D Gregorio-Hetem J., Lepine J.R.D., Quast G.R., Torres C.A.O., de la Reza R., 1992, AJ 103, 549 =1992AJ....103..549G Kholopov P.N., et al., 1987, General Catalogue of Variable Stars-GCVS4, Nauka Publishing House, Moscow Ninger-Kosibowa S., 1955, Prace Wrocl. Tow. Naukowego Ser. B, Nr. 57 Torres C.A.O., Quast G.R., de la Reza R., Gregorio-Hetem J., Lepine J.R.D., 1995, AJ 109, 2146 =1995AJ....109.2146T Vogt N., Bateson F.M., 1982, A&AS 48, 383 =1982A&AS...48..383V Photometry, Cousins Photometry, UBVRI Stars, variable stars: AGB and post-AGB stars: variables: general surveys We present the results of an optical photometric survey of 616 irregular variables. The targets were selected among objects classified as L, L:, I, I:, IS and IS: in the General Catalogue of Variable Stars and New Catalogue of Suspected Variable Stars.

Name Star name --- HJD Heliocentric Julian day d Vmag V magnitude mag U-B U-B colour index mag B-V B-V colour index mag V-Rc V-R_c_ colour index mag Rc-Ic R_c_-I_c_ colour index mag e_Vmag Uncertainty on V magnitude mag e_U-B Uncertainty on U-B colour index mag e_B-V Uncertainty on B-V colour index mag e_V-Rc Uncertainty on V-R_c_ colour index mag e_Rc-Ic Uncertainty on R_c_-I_c_ colour index mag Rem See note number=1 *: Nights without calibration sequences (see discussion in the paper) 1: Averaged values of magnitude and colours. Object is a Mira variable 2: Averaged values of magnitude and colours. Object is a cataclysmic variable 3: 10 arcsec optical pair. Possible contamination 4: Classified as probable Herbig Ae/Be object in Gregorio-Hetem et al. (1992AJ....103..549G) 5: 10 arcsec optical pair (~2mag weaker) included in the diaphragm 6: Averaged values of magnitude and colours. Object is a symbiotic u star 7: Suggested as Cepheid variable by Booth & Charles (1982MNRAS.201p..25B) 8: Object is a RV Tauri variable 9: Optical pair (~2mag weaker) included in the diaphragm 10: Quoted as suspected of cataclysmic variable in Vogt & Bateson (1982A&AS...48..383V) and Downes & Shara (1993, Cat. <V/79>) 11: Quoted as suspected of cataclysmic variable of Z Cam type in the GCVS4 (kholopov et al. 1987, Cat. <II/139>) 12: Classified as T Tauri star in Torres et al. (1995AJ....109.2146T) 13: Carbon star 14: Optical pair. The two stars were included in the diaphragm 15: 5 arcsec optical pair (~3mag weaker) included in the diaphragm 16: Constant star. Possibly indicated wrongly in the finding chart of Ninger-Kosibowa (1955, Prace Wrocl. Tow. Naukowego Ser. B, Nr. 57) 17: 10 arcsec optical pair. The two stars were included in the diaphragm 18: 10 arcsec optical pair. Possible contamination 19: Object is a RR Lyrae variable 20: <10 arcsec optical pair. The two objects were included in the diaphragm 21: Optical pair. The two stars included in the diaphragm 22: Object is a Be star 23: 5 arcsec optical pair included in the diaphragm -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Acknowledgements: Deonisio Cieslinski <deo@das.inpe.br> --- Patricia Bauer CDS 1996Dec09 J_A+AS_124_55.xml