J/A+AS/106/1 J/A+AS/106/1 Radio data in Dumbbell galaxies L Gregorini H R De Ruiter P Parma E M Sadler G Vettolani R D Ekers Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 106 1 1994 1994A&AS..106....1G galaxies: clusters: general galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cD radio continuum: galaxies We present radio observations at 6 cm for 93 ACO clusters, in which the brightest member consists of either two galaxies of roughly equal brightness inside a common halo (a dumbbell) or has multiple nuclei. A subsample of 27 dumbbell systems, belonging to a volume-limited sample, was observed with the VLA and ATCA. The remaining clusters were mapped with the VLA. The detection rate in the volume-limited sample is 44%. In all 93 clusters observed 43 brightest cluster members were detected in the radio. Parameters are presented for all the radio sources detected in the cluster fields.

Name Cluster name number= A367: there is a very faint (2 sigma) radio source right at the position of the galaxy. A1791: the radio source is complex, and the galaxy is almost certainly associated with the source. A2854: there is little doubt that the dumbbell system and the radio source are associated, even though the positional coincidence is difficult to judge, due to the absence of a strong, well-defined radio core. A3150: there are three galaxies close to the radio source. This is the only unclear case in the whole sample. The identification should be considered uncertain. A3151: one galaxy falls right inside the double radio source, so the identification is probably correct. A3391: the radio source is complex; a faint core is present and lies close (~5 arcsec) to the eastern galaxy of the dumbbell system, and we therefore consider the radio source associated with this galaxy. A3432: see "Post-Publication Notes" A3532: similar to the case of A1791: one galaxy is in between the two lobes of a double source. The identification is quite likely correct. A3618: the western galaxy is probably the one associated with the radio source. A3706: the radio identification is uncertain due to the very faint radio source associated. --- N Reference number of the source; a letter refers to the different components of the extended sources number= A367: there is a very faint (2 sigma) radio source right at the position of the galaxy. A1791: the radio source is complex, and the galaxy is almost certainly associated with the source. A2854: there is little doubt that the dumbbell system and the radio source are associated, even though the positional coincidence is difficult to judge, due to the absence of a strong, well-defined radio core. A3150: there are three galaxies close to the radio source. This is the only unclear case in the whole sample. The identification should be considered uncertain. A3151: one galaxy falls right inside the double radio source, so the identification is probably correct. A3391: the radio source is complex; a faint core is present and lies close (~5 arcsec) to the eastern galaxy of the dumbbell system, and we therefore consider the radio source associated with this galaxy. A3432: see "Post-Publication Notes" A3532: similar to the case of A1791: one galaxy is in between the two lobes of a double source. The identification is quite likely correct. A3618: the western galaxy is probably the one associated with the radio source. A3706: the radio identification is uncertain due to the very faint radio source associated. --- RAh Right ascension 1950.0 number=1 in table4, the right ascension and declination refers to the radio emission peak. See also Note (2) below h RAm Right ascension 1950.0 number=1 in table4, the right ascension and declination refers to the radio emission peak. See also Note (2) below min RAs Right ascension 1950.0 number=1 in table4, the right ascension and declination refers to the radio emission peak. See also Note (2) below s DE- Declination sign number= A367: there is a very faint (2 sigma) radio source right at the position of the galaxy. A1791: the radio source is complex, and the galaxy is almost certainly associated with the source. A2854: there is little doubt that the dumbbell system and the radio source are associated, even though the positional coincidence is difficult to judge, due to the absence of a strong, well-defined radio core. A3150: there are three galaxies close to the radio source. This is the only unclear case in the whole sample. The identification should be considered uncertain. A3151: one galaxy falls right inside the double radio source, so the identification is probably correct. A3391: the radio source is complex; a faint core is present and lies close (~5 arcsec) to the eastern galaxy of the dumbbell system, and we therefore consider the radio source associated with this galaxy. A3432: see "Post-Publication Notes" A3532: similar to the case of A1791: one galaxy is in between the two lobes of a double source. The identification is quite likely correct. A3618: the western galaxy is probably the one associated with the radio source. A3706: the radio identification is uncertain due to the very faint radio source associated. --- DEd Declination 1950.0 number=1 in table4, the right ascension and declination refers to the radio emission peak. See also Note (2) below deg DEm Declination 1950.0 number=1 in table4, the right ascension and declination refers to the radio emission peak. See also Note (2) below arcmin DEs Declination 1950.0 number=1 in table4, the right ascension and declination refers to the radio emission peak. See also Note (2) below arcsec l_S6cm limit flag on S6cm number= A367: there is a very faint (2 sigma) radio source right at the position of the galaxy. A1791: the radio source is complex, and the galaxy is almost certainly associated with the source. A2854: there is little doubt that the dumbbell system and the radio source are associated, even though the positional coincidence is difficult to judge, due to the absence of a strong, well-defined radio core. A3150: there are three galaxies close to the radio source. This is the only unclear case in the whole sample. The identification should be considered uncertain. A3151: one galaxy falls right inside the double radio source, so the identification is probably correct. A3391: the radio source is complex; a faint core is present and lies close (~5 arcsec) to the eastern galaxy of the dumbbell system, and we therefore consider the radio source associated with this galaxy. A3432: see "Post-Publication Notes" A3532: similar to the case of A1791: one galaxy is in between the two lobes of a double source. The identification is quite likely correct. A3618: the western galaxy is probably the one associated with the radio source. A3706: the radio identification is uncertain due to the very faint radio source associated. --- S6cm Total flux density at 6 cm (5 GHz) not corrected for attenuation effects number=2 in table5, -For non detected radio sources, the right ascension and declination refers to optical position of the dominant galaxy the F value refers to 3 sigma limit for the flux; -For the detected radio sources, the right ascension and declination of the first row refers to optical position of the identified galaxy, in the following rows, the parameters refers to radio parameters -For A3432, the high flux 363.5mJy is likely an error (see "Post-Publication Notes" above) mJy FWHM1 Full Width Half Maximun (FWHM) along major axis of a Gaussian fitting of the source number= A367: there is a very faint (2 sigma) radio source right at the position of the galaxy. A1791: the radio source is complex, and the galaxy is almost certainly associated with the source. A2854: there is little doubt that the dumbbell system and the radio source are associated, even though the positional coincidence is difficult to judge, due to the absence of a strong, well-defined radio core. A3150: there are three galaxies close to the radio source. This is the only unclear case in the whole sample. The identification should be considered uncertain. A3151: one galaxy falls right inside the double radio source, so the identification is probably correct. A3391: the radio source is complex; a faint core is present and lies close (~5 arcsec) to the eastern galaxy of the dumbbell system, and we therefore consider the radio source associated with this galaxy. A3432: see "Post-Publication Notes" A3532: similar to the case of A1791: one galaxy is in between the two lobes of a double source. The identification is quite likely correct. A3618: the western galaxy is probably the one associated with the radio source. A3706: the radio identification is uncertain due to the very faint radio source associated. arcsec x An 'x' indicates two values of FWHM along major and minor axes number= A367: there is a very faint (2 sigma) radio source right at the position of the galaxy. A1791: the radio source is complex, and the galaxy is almost certainly associated with the source. A2854: there is little doubt that the dumbbell system and the radio source are associated, even though the positional coincidence is difficult to judge, due to the absence of a strong, well-defined radio core. A3150: there are three galaxies close to the radio source. This is the only unclear case in the whole sample. The identification should be considered uncertain. A3151: one galaxy falls right inside the double radio source, so the identification is probably correct. A3391: the radio source is complex; a faint core is present and lies close (~5 arcsec) to the eastern galaxy of the dumbbell system, and we therefore consider the radio source associated with this galaxy. A3432: see "Post-Publication Notes" A3532: similar to the case of A1791: one galaxy is in between the two lobes of a double source. The identification is quite likely correct. A3618: the western galaxy is probably the one associated with the radio source. A3706: the radio identification is uncertain due to the very faint radio source associated. --- l_FWHM2 limit flag for second values of FWHM number= A367: there is a very faint (2 sigma) radio source right at the position of the galaxy. A1791: the radio source is complex, and the galaxy is almost certainly associated with the source. A2854: there is little doubt that the dumbbell system and the radio source are associated, even though the positional coincidence is difficult to judge, due to the absence of a strong, well-defined radio core. A3150: there are three galaxies close to the radio source. This is the only unclear case in the whole sample. The identification should be considered uncertain. A3151: one galaxy falls right inside the double radio source, so the identification is probably correct. A3391: the radio source is complex; a faint core is present and lies close (~5 arcsec) to the eastern galaxy of the dumbbell system, and we therefore consider the radio source associated with this galaxy. A3432: see "Post-Publication Notes" A3532: similar to the case of A1791: one galaxy is in between the two lobes of a double source. The identification is quite likely correct. A3618: the western galaxy is probably the one associated with the radio source. A3706: the radio identification is uncertain due to the very faint radio source associated. --- FWHM2 FWHM (along minor axis if x in column 53) number= A367: there is a very faint (2 sigma) radio source right at the position of the galaxy. A1791: the radio source is complex, and the galaxy is almost certainly associated with the source. A2854: there is little doubt that the dumbbell system and the radio source are associated, even though the positional coincidence is difficult to judge, due to the absence of a strong, well-defined radio core. A3150: there are three galaxies close to the radio source. This is the only unclear case in the whole sample. The identification should be considered uncertain. A3151: one galaxy falls right inside the double radio source, so the identification is probably correct. A3391: the radio source is complex; a faint core is present and lies close (~5 arcsec) to the eastern galaxy of the dumbbell system, and we therefore consider the radio source associated with this galaxy. A3432: see "Post-Publication Notes" A3532: similar to the case of A1791: one galaxy is in between the two lobes of a double source. The identification is quite likely correct. A3618: the western galaxy is probably the one associated with the radio source. A3706: the radio identification is uncertain due to the very faint radio source associated. arcsec l_PA limit flag on PA number= A367: there is a very faint (2 sigma) radio source right at the position of the galaxy. A1791: the radio source is complex, and the galaxy is almost certainly associated with the source. A2854: there is little doubt that the dumbbell system and the radio source are associated, even though the positional coincidence is difficult to judge, due to the absence of a strong, well-defined radio core. A3150: there are three galaxies close to the radio source. This is the only unclear case in the whole sample. The identification should be considered uncertain. A3151: one galaxy falls right inside the double radio source, so the identification is probably correct. A3391: the radio source is complex; a faint core is present and lies close (~5 arcsec) to the eastern galaxy of the dumbbell system, and we therefore consider the radio source associated with this galaxy. A3432: see "Post-Publication Notes" A3532: similar to the case of A1791: one galaxy is in between the two lobes of a double source. The identification is quite likely correct. A3618: the western galaxy is probably the one associated with the radio source. A3706: the radio identification is uncertain due to the very faint radio source associated. --- PA Position angle of a Gaussian fitting the source number= A367: there is a very faint (2 sigma) radio source right at the position of the galaxy. A1791: the radio source is complex, and the galaxy is almost certainly associated with the source. A2854: there is little doubt that the dumbbell system and the radio source are associated, even though the positional coincidence is difficult to judge, due to the absence of a strong, well-defined radio core. A3150: there are three galaxies close to the radio source. This is the only unclear case in the whole sample. The identification should be considered uncertain. A3151: one galaxy falls right inside the double radio source, so the identification is probably correct. A3391: the radio source is complex; a faint core is present and lies close (~5 arcsec) to the eastern galaxy of the dumbbell system, and we therefore consider the radio source associated with this galaxy. A3432: see "Post-Publication Notes" A3532: similar to the case of A1791: one galaxy is in between the two lobes of a double source. The identification is quite likely correct. A3618: the western galaxy is probably the one associated with the radio source. A3706: the radio identification is uncertain due to the very faint radio source associated. deg LAS Largest angular size for complex sources number= A367: there is a very faint (2 sigma) radio source right at the position of the galaxy. A1791: the radio source is complex, and the galaxy is almost certainly associated with the source. A2854: there is little doubt that the dumbbell system and the radio source are associated, even though the positional coincidence is difficult to judge, due to the absence of a strong, well-defined radio core. A3150: there are three galaxies close to the radio source. This is the only unclear case in the whole sample. The identification should be considered uncertain. A3151: one galaxy falls right inside the double radio source, so the identification is probably correct. A3391: the radio source is complex; a faint core is present and lies close (~5 arcsec) to the eastern galaxy of the dumbbell system, and we therefore consider the radio source associated with this galaxy. A3432: see "Post-Publication Notes" A3532: similar to the case of A1791: one galaxy is in between the two lobes of a double source. The identification is quite likely correct. A3618: the western galaxy is probably the one associated with the radio source. A3706: the radio identification is uncertain due to the very faint radio source associated. arcsec D Distance of the source from the pointing position number= A367: there is a very faint (2 sigma) radio source right at the position of the galaxy. A1791: the radio source is complex, and the galaxy is almost certainly associated with the source. A2854: there is little doubt that the dumbbell system and the radio source are associated, even though the positional coincidence is difficult to judge, due to the absence of a strong, well-defined radio core. A3150: there are three galaxies close to the radio source. This is the only unclear case in the whole sample. The identification should be considered uncertain. A3151: one galaxy falls right inside the double radio source, so the identification is probably correct. A3391: the radio source is complex; a faint core is present and lies close (~5 arcsec) to the eastern galaxy of the dumbbell system, and we therefore consider the radio source associated with this galaxy. A3432: see "Post-Publication Notes" A3532: similar to the case of A1791: one galaxy is in between the two lobes of a double source. The identification is quite likely correct. A3618: the western galaxy is probably the one associated with the radio source. A3706: the radio identification is uncertain due to the very faint radio source associated. arcmin Patricia Bauer CDS 1994Oct14 UNKNOWN UNKNOWN *02-Mar-1994: first released *14-Oct-1994: ReadMe modified UNKNOWN UNKNOWN Post-publication Notes: *14-Oct-1994: following a remark by H. Andernach (heinz@adel.univ-lyon1.fr) on the high value (363.5mJy) of the peak flux of A3432, L. Gregorini (GREGORINI@astbo1.bo.cnr.it) answered: "I had no time to directly check on the map (I am teaching), but from my printed paper I agree with you: the correct value must be a factor of 10 less. Thank you for finding this mistake." J_A+AS_106_1.xml