<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE dataset SYSTEM "http://tarantella.gsfc.nasa.gov/xml/dataset_048.dtd">
<dataset subject="astronomy" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/XML/XLink/0.9">
	<title>Catalogue of stellar ultraviolet fluxes (TD1):
A compilation of absolute stellar fluxes measured by the Sky Survey
Telescope (S2/68) aboard the ESRO satellite TD-1</title>
	<altname type="ADC">2059B</altname>
		<altname type="CDS">II/59B</altname>
		<altname type="brief">Catalogue of stellar UV fluxes</altname>
	<reference>
		<source>
<other>
	<title>Catalogue of stellar ultraviolet fluxes (TD1):
A compilation of absolute stellar fluxes measured by the Sky Survey
Telescope (S2/68) aboard the ESRO satellite TD-1</title>
	<author>
			<initial>G</initial>
			<initial>I</initial>
			<lastName>Thompson</lastName></author>
	<author>
			<initial>K</initial>
			<lastName>Nandy</lastName></author>
	<author>
			<initial>C</initial>
			<lastName>Jamar</lastName></author>
	<author>
			<initial>A</initial>
			<lastName>Monfils</lastName></author>
	<author>
			<initial>L</initial>
			<lastName>Houziaux</lastName></author>
	<author>
			<initial>D</initial>
			<initial>J</initial>
			<lastName>Carnochan</lastName></author>
	<author>
			<initial>R</initial>
			<lastName>Wilson</lastName></author>
	<name>The Science Research Council, U.K.</name>
	<publisher>???</publisher>
	<city>???</city>
	
		<date>
			<year>1978</year></date>
	<bibcode>1978QB6.C389.......</bibcode></other></source>
	<related>
			<holding role="similar">III/39 : UV Bright Star Spectrophotometric Catalog (Jamar et al., 1976)<xlink:simple href="III/39"/></holding>
			<holding role="similar">II/86 : Supplement to the UVBS Photometric Catalogue<xlink:simple href="II/86"/></holding>
			  Boksenberg A., Evans R.G., Fowler R.G., Gardner I.S.K., Houziaux L.,
    Humphries C.M., Jamar C., Macau D., Malaise D., Monfils A., Nandy K.,
    Thompson G.I., Wilson R., Wroe H.,  =1973MNRAS.163..291B
  Haynes D.S., Latham D.W., =1975ApJ...197..593H
  Humphries C.M., Jamar C., Malaise D., Wroe H., =1976A&amp;A....49..389H
  Jamar C., Macau-Hercot D., Monfils A., Thompson G.I., Houziaux L.,
    Wilson R., 1976, "Ultraviolet Bright Star Spectrophotometric
    Catalogue", ESA Special Report 27 (Cat. &lt;III/39>)
  Thompson G.I., Nandy K., Jamar C., Monfils A., Houziaux L., Carnochan A.,
    Wilson R., =1979BICDS..17...78T</related></reference>
	<keywords parentListURL="http://messier.gsfc.nasa.gov/xml/keywordlists/adc_keywords.html">
			<keyword xlink:href="Photometry_ultraviolet.html">Photometry, ultraviolet</keyword></keywords>
	<descriptions>
				<description>
				<para>
   (adapted from ADC documentation EAC-T-5294-0028):
    The Belgian/UK Ultraviolet Sky Survey Telescope (S2/68) in the ESRO
    TD1 satellite carried out a controlled scan of the whole sky. It
    measured the absolute ultraviolet flux distribution between 2740A
    (274nm) and 1350A (135nm) of point sources down to tenth visual
    magnitude for unreddened early B stars. The S2/68 experiment has been
    described by Boksenberg et al. (=1973MNRAS.163..291B) and the absolute
    calibration by Humphries et al. (=1976A&amp;A....49..389H).</para><para>    The catalog contains results from the sky-scan experiment in the TD1
    satellite of the European Space Research Organization. The catalog
    lists the absolute ultraviolet fluxes in four passbands:
    ---------------------------------------------------------
    Passband Center:   274.0nm   236.5nm   196.5nm   156.5nm
    Effective Width:    31.0      33.0      33.0      33.0
    ---------------------------------------------------------
    for 31215 stars. The stars have been selected subject to the
    constraint that the signal-to-noise ratio should be at least 10.0 in
    any one of the four passbands.</para><para>    Many of the fainter stars of spectral types later than A5 do not have
    significant signals in all of the spectrophotometric channels
    (particularly the 1565A channel). Consequently, after the removal of
    the background, they can randomly give rise to small negative values
    of flux. We have decided not to suppress these negative values but to
    give them together with their error as they can be significant when
    considered as part of a statistical sample.</para><para>    Although the sky coverage is essentially complete, the catalogue does
    not contain the fluxes for all stars that fall within the limit of the
    sensitivity of the instrument. If any star expected to be present is
    missing, then its signal is probably blended with that of a nearby
    star in which case the data have been discarded.</para><para>    The fluxes F(lambda), and errors, sigma(lambda),
    can be transformed to the visual magnitude scale using the absolute
    calibration of Haynes &amp; Latham (=1975ApJ...197..593H):
               m(lambda) = -2.5 log10 F(lambda) - 21.175
         sigma_m(lambda) = 1.086  sigma(lambda)/F(lambda)</para><para>    Also:
              F(nu) = 3.336x10^-19^ lambda^2 F(lambda)
              m(nu) = -2.5 log10 F(lambda) - 5 log10 lambda - 18.724
        sigma_m(nu) = 1.086 sigma(lambda)/F(lambda)
    where F(lambda) is in units of erg.cm^-2^.s^-1^.A^-1^  (mW/m2/(0.1nm))
             lambda is in Angstroms and
              F(nu) is in units of erg.cm^-2^.s^-1^.Hz^-1^
                                  (mW/m2/Hz = 10^23^Jy)</para></description>
                        <details><para><observatory base="space"> TD 1A</observatory></para></details></descriptions>
	<tableHead>
		<tableLinks>
				<tableLink xlink:href="catalog">
	<title>The Catalog of Stellar UV Fluxes</title></tableLink></tableLinks>
	<fields>
		<field>
			<name>TD1</name>
			<definition>Catalog running number</definition>
			<units>---</units></field>
		<field>
			<name>HD</name>
			<definition>Henry Draper Catalog number</definition>
			<units>---</units></field>
		<field>
			<name>UVBSflag</name>
			<definition>'1' if in UVBS Catalog
                                     (Jamar et al. 1976)  (=III/39A)</definition>
			<units>---</units></field>
		<field>
			<name>DM</name>
			<definition>Durchmusterung (BD/CD/CPD) designation, as
                                     CCsZZNNNNN  (catalog, sign, zone number)</definition>
			<units>---</units></field>
		<field>
			<name>S2/68</name>
			<definition>S2/68 Catalog Number</definition>
			<units>---</units></field>
		<field>
			<name>Vmag</name>
			<definition>Visual magnitude</definition>
			<units>mag</units></field>
		<field>
			<name>SpType</name>
			<definition>Spectral type</definition>
			<units>---</units></field>
		<field>
			<name>RArad</name>
			<definition>Right ascension, 1950.0, in radians</definition>
			<units>rad</units></field>
		<field>
			<name>DErad</name>
			<definition>Declination, 1950.0, in radians</definition>
			<units>rad</units></field>
		<field>
			<name>F2740</name>
			<definition>=-10.00 Flux in 2740A band (see Exp)</definition>
			<units>10mW/m2/nm</units></field>
		<field>
			<name>e_F2740</name>
			<definition>=-1.00  Standard error for F2740 (see Exp)</definition>
			<units>10mW/m2/nm</units></field>
		<field>
			<name>F2365</name>
			<definition>=-10.00 Flux in 2365A band  (see Exp)</definition>
			<units>10mW/m2/nm</units></field>
		<field>
			<name>e_F2365</name>
			<definition>=-1.00  Standard error for F2365
                                                 (see Exp)
	<footnote footnoteId="???"><para>number=1</para>
			<para>a few records with standard errors in F2365 and F1965 larger
    than 100.00 were assigned a value of '99.99'. This occured in
    records (TD1 numbers):
            -----------------------------------
              TD1      HD      Band     Error
            -----------------------------------
              639      6676    1965    133.70
            14977     91979    1965    110.22
            17270    123445    1965    114.56
            18199    137058    2365    119.69
            18199    137058    1965    213.83
            -----------------------------------
    In reference to these specific figures, G. I. Thompson remarks in a
    private communication: "...the formal computed error has turned out to
    be so large that the result is probably worthless anyway."
</para></footnote></definition>
			<units>10mW/m2/nm</units></field>
		<field>
			<name>F1965</name>
			<definition>=-10.00 Flux in 1965A band (see Exp)</definition>
			<units>10mW/m2/nm</units></field>
		<field>
			<name>e_F1965</name>
			<definition>=-1.00  Standard error for F1965
                                                 (see Exp)
	<footnote footnoteId="???"><para>number=1</para>
			<para>a few records with standard errors in F2365 and F1965 larger
    than 100.00 were assigned a value of '99.99'. This occured in
    records (TD1 numbers):
            -----------------------------------
              TD1      HD      Band     Error
            -----------------------------------
              639      6676    1965    133.70
            14977     91979    1965    110.22
            17270    123445    1965    114.56
            18199    137058    2365    119.69
            18199    137058    1965    213.83
            -----------------------------------
    In reference to these specific figures, G. I. Thompson remarks in a
    private communication: "...the formal computed error has turned out to
    be so large that the result is probably worthless anyway."
</para></footnote></definition>
			<units>10mW/m2/nm</units></field>
		<field>
			<name>F1565</name>
			<definition>=-10.00 Flux in 1565A band (see Exp)</definition>
			<units>10mW/m2/nm</units></field>
		<field>
			<name>e_F1565</name>
			<definition>=-1.00  Standard error for F1565 (see Exp)</definition>
			<units>10mW/m2/nm</units></field>
		<field>
			<name>Exp</name>
			<definition>10-base exponent for all Fluxes,
                                     e.g.  Flux(2740) = 10^Exp^ x F2740</definition>
			<units>---</units></field></fields></tableHead>
	
	<history>
		<ingest>
	
			<creator>
				<lastName>Francois Ochsenbein</lastName>
				<affiliation>CDS</affiliation></creator>
	<date>
		<year>1995</year><month>Oct</month><day>24</day></date></ingest>
		
		<revisions>
	<revision>
		<creator>
			<lastName>UNKNOWN</lastName></creator>
		<date><year>UNKNOWN</year></date>
		<para> * from ADC Documentation (EAC-T-5294-0028) by Robert S. Hill and
   Theresa A. Nagy (1981), revised April 1991 by Susan E. Gessner
   and Lee E. Brotzman, NASA/GSFC:

    The "Catalogue of Stellar Ultraviolet Fluxes", which represents
    results from the sky-scan experiment in the TD1 satellite of the
    European Space Research Organization (ESRO), was received from Dr. G.
    I. Thompson of the Royal Observatory, Edinburgh, Scotland. The present
    documentation is mostly a rearrangement of material provided by Dr.
    Thompson.

    The tape as received was edited at GSFC as follows: five
    standard-error values represented by asterisk-filled fields were
    changed to 99.99. The actual values as given in the hard copy version
    of the catalogue are given in the "Byte-by-Byte description" above.

    Some of the pertinent statistics for the data on this tape have been
    determined. The number of entries which have no valid data for the
    star as a function of wavelength are:
                    --------------------------
                    Lamda (A)          Entries
                    --------------------------
                       2740               5
                       2365             752
                       1965             747
                       1565             735
                    --------------------------

    and, the number of entries that have small negative flux values as a
    function of wavelength are:
                    --------------------------
                    Lamda (A)          Entries
                    --------------------------
                       2740               8
                       2365              97
                       1965             154
                       1565            3392
                    --------------------------

    The catalog was again revised in April 1991. Two byte catalog
    designations were added to the Durchmusterung numbers. During this
    process, Dr. Nancy Roman discovered that several of the values given
    in the original catalogue for the right ascension field (bytes 40-48)
    were in error. These values were corrected by subtracting 0.0043633
    from the original value. The records in which this change occured are:
                        8703       9546      21996
                        9322       9671      31105
                        9509      10112      31139
                        9414      21723
 * October 1991: "Selected Astronomical Catalogs" Vol. 1 CD-ROM, directory
   /photom/td1
 * 24-Oct-1995: Documentation file added at CDS (F. Ochsenbein, J. Florsch)</para></revision></revisions></history>
	<identifier>II_59B.xml</identifier></dataset>
